The 2018 General Social Survey found the proportions
of Roman Catholics, Evangelical Christians, and people not affiliated with any
institutional religion to each being within the margin of error around 23 percent of the
American population. To be sure, to claim no institutional religion does not necessarily mean not being
religious, or at least spiritual. Where the heart is concerned, religious
institutions, or organizations, do not monopolize religious or spiritual
sensibilities or sensitivities. In fact, I contend that a spiritual or even
religious instinct exists in humans that can differ among individuals in
salience or force. To be sure, people in whom the instinct is pressing may tend
to belong to religious organizations, but this is not to say that the latter
are necessary for feeling and manifesting the instinct. This is particularly
true, I submit, where programmed worship is unwittingly formulated in a way
that actually interrupts or thwarts outright the experience of transcendence, whether in sustained prayer, worship, communion, or meditation.
Showing posts with label religious organization. Show all posts
Showing posts with label religious organization. Show all posts
Sunday, April 21, 2019
Wednesday, July 19, 2017
The Regensburg Domspatzen: Systemic Abuse of Kids in an Established Religious Institution
The utility from beautiful music for many does not justify
the physical and sexual abuse of a relative few. Even though utilitarianism
goes by the motto, the greatest pleasure (and least pain) for the greatest
number, the severity of the pain to a few can, I submit, outweigh a more
widespread, yet relatively superficial, pleasure for others. Surely the
intensity of pleasure and pain must enter into the ethical calculus. I have in
mind here the Regensburg Domspatzen, a Roman Catholic boys choir, in the E.U.
state of Germany. This case points to the default power of established
institutions and a religious psychology.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
