For
anyone interested in filmmaking, a film that features the internal operations
of a film studio—especially one during the “Golden Age” of Hollywood—is likely
to be captivating. After all, as Eddie Mannix, the studio executive in Hail,
Caesar! (2016), says, the “vast masses of humanity look to pictures
for information and uplift and, yes, entertainment.” This film provides all
three for its audience on what film-making was like in the studio system. With
regards to the Christian theology, however, the result is mixed. The film makes the point that theological
information best comes out indirectly from dramatic dialogue rather than
discussion on theology itself. In other words, inserting a theological lecture
into a film’s narrative is less effective than an impassioned speech by which
entertainment and uplift can carry the information.
Showing posts with label film and business. Show all posts
Showing posts with label film and business. Show all posts
Sunday, May 24, 2020
Saturday, February 1, 2020
Judaism and Christianity on Climate Change
First Reformed (2017) contains fundamental ideas concerning the
human condition and wrestles with the relationship between religion and
politics. Ideas play a significant role
in the film, hence it can be used in support of the thesis that film is a
viable medium in which to make philosophical (and theological) ideas
transparent and derive dramatic tension from clashing ideas. In this film, the
ideas that clash concern the role of religion in the political issue of climate
change—or is that issue primarily religious?
The full essay is at "First Reformed."
Monday, May 20, 2019
NASA and Its Contractors: The Challenger Disaster
Roger Boisjoly was a booster rocket engineer at a NASA contractor, Morton Thiokol. Boisjoly blew the whistle both within the company and to NASA regarding the danger of the rubber in the o-rings, which seal the connections in the shuttle’s rockets, being insufficiently elastic in cold weather. Although The Challenger Disaster (2019) is not a documentary, the film’s narrative, which centers on Roger, or "Adam," is oriented to understanding why the Challenger space shuttle exploded after being launched on January 28, 1986. In other words, although some names are different and the conversations are not verbatim in the film, the factors that contributed to the actual explosion are presented. In fact, the film leans too much on technical details before the disaster and legal arguments afterwards without adequate entertaining elements to make the film enjoyable. However, the film's political function in informing a mass market of why part of the government-business system was broken is valuable. In fact, this mission demonstrates that the medium of motion pictures is capable of aiding in social, political, economic, and religious awareness and education, and thus development.
The full essay is at "The Challenger Disaster."
The full essay is at "The Challenger Disaster."
Saturday, February 11, 2017
The Founder
Tension between the founder of a business and the managers
that eventually assume control is perhaps unavoidable. Such tension can be cut
with a knife in the film, The Founder (2016),
which tells the story of how McDonalds went from Dick and Mac McDonald’s
restaurant in San Bernardino, California to a nationwide corporation headed by
Ray Kroc. From an ethical standpoint, I submit that both the McDonald brothers
and Kroc come out as less than salubrious.
The full essay is at "The Founder."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



