The film, Paul: The Apostle of Christ (2018), carries great weight theologically in that Paul describes a very particular kind of love that Jesus preaches and lives out in the Gospels. In so doing, the film shows an overlooked criterion by which people who claim to be Christian can be ascertained as such or not. One implication from the film is that Christianity has contained (and still contains) a number of nominal Christians who are not in fact Christian. A related implication is that the historically (and modern) criteria by which people are considered (and consider themselves) Christian is not as useful (and valid) as the overlooked criterion that is so salient in the film.
Showing posts with label government and religion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label government and religion. Show all posts
Sunday, January 13, 2019
Tuesday, December 5, 2017
Pope Francis: Possessing Nuclear Weapons is Indefensible
Pope Francis said late in 2017 that the nuclear arms race
had become irrational and immoral. The irrationality itself rendered even just
the possession of nuclear weapons as immoral, according to the pope. Whereas
past popes had recognized deterrence as a legitimator, both irrationality and
the extent and “upgrading” of such weapons were factors in Pope Francis’s
admittedly personal view. Yet was his basis only moral, or religious in nature?
The full essay is at "The Pope on Nuclear Weapons."
Friday, December 30, 2016
A Self-Governing Chinese Catholic Church: Conflating Statecraft and Religious Authority
In late December, 2016, as the Chinese government was
negotiating a deal to improve relations with the Vatican, Yu Zhengsheng, a
senior Communist Party leader, “endorsed the notion of a self-governed Chinese
Catholic church.”[1] The
key point, I submit, hinges on governance.
In what sense does governance apply rightfully (or fittingly) to a religious
organization? This is a question to be put both to the Chinese government and
the Vatican.
Yu Zhengsheng meeting Chinese Catholic religious authorities (Source: Yao Dawei/Xinhua)
The complete essay is at "A Self-Governing Chinese Catholic Church."
1. Javier C. Hernandez, “Catholic
Churches in China Should Be Independent of Vatican, Official Says,” The New York Times, December 30, 2016.
Saturday, May 2, 2015
The Dalai Lama’s Reincarnation: By Government Fiat?
Reincarnation is a difficult gig for Buddhists. Being reborn
for yet another life is not a good thing; bad karma (i.e., residue from bad
choices in life) keeps a soul on the wheel of samsara. Because life-after-life
involves suffering, a Buddhist strives for Nirvana, or enlightenment, which
releases a soul from the cycle of being reborn yet again. Reincarnation is a
difficult gig for Buddhists also because unlike Hinduism, Buddhism denies the
very existence of a soul (atman) as
an entity. How, then, can something that does not exist go on to be re-clothed
in another body for another life? Yet another problem for the devout Buddhist
concerns government officials who claim that they can decide whether a certain
soul reincarnates, and if so, into which body. In 2014, for example, the
Chinese government made it known that it would pick the next reincarnated Dalai
Lama—the spiritual leader of Tibetan Buddhists.
The full essay is at “Dalai
Lama’s Reincarnation.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

