While being interviewed on CNBC on March 7, 2014, Alan Greenspan spoke a bit on the problem of irrational
exuberance in a market. Pointing to the failure of the Federal Reserve under
his chairmanship to innocuously dissolve the “dot.com” bubble in the 1990s, Greenspan
said he had come to the conclusion that asset-appreciation bubbles cannot be “defused”
(for reasons he says are in his new book) “unless you break the back of the
actual euphoria that generates the bubbles.”[1]
Alas, piercing that wave would involve nothing short of unplugging a basic
instinct in human nature; both monetary and fiscal policy would doubtless come
up short. However, I suspect that the field of rhetoric may have something to
say about how we can deflate societal exuberance, but only on the condition
that greater clarity will have been achieved in identifying whether a given
market is overvalued due to emotional excess (i.e.g, emotive greed having
reached a critical mass) circumventing normal risk-aversion.
Showing posts with label Andrew Sorkin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Andrew Sorkin. Show all posts
Friday, March 7, 2014
Thursday, February 24, 2011
Executive Stature: Glimpses of the Man Behind the Curtain
One of the perks of corporate office is the presumption of stature and legitimacy. In other words, the general public typically brings all sorts of assumptions along when reading about the behavior of a CEO. I contend that the reality of the person behind the curtain is far different from what is portrayed. That is to say, at least with respect to how CEO's typically want to be viewed in terms of corporate responsibility, I suspect that the reality in the executive suites is far different. In fact, the reality can be downright childish. Richard Fuld, who was the CEO at Lehman Brothers, may well have behaved like a six year old when upset. Had the general public been given a view of Fuld's antics, we would have shaken our heads not simply out of utter disbelief that such immaturity could be in such a position, but also in recognition of the gap between public and private persona. Such a gap is dangerous in a republic wherein the electorate is to hold the government in check (and the government in turn is charged with protecting the public and the market system itself from being compromised from firms too big to fail).
The full essay is at "Executive Stature."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)