In the case of the U.S., once someone enters one of the
states, that person can move from state to state without having to show a visa
or passport. The open borders correspond to the states that are members of the
United States. In the case of the E.U., however, the open borders do not
necessarily dovetail with the states that are members of the European Union.
This presents problems that do not exist in the U.S.
Saturday, March 9, 2013
The Schengen Agreement: Germany Discriminating Against the Roma?
Wednesday, March 6, 2013
JPMorgan Management Evades Stockholders
After the $6 billion trading loss at JP Morgan, the U.S.
Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations issued a report raising the
prospect of wider problems than that of a rogue lower-level trader.
Specifically, the report suggests that executives at the bank “ignored warning
signs and failed to alert investors about changes to its method for detecting
risk,” according to the New York Times. That
is, the bank had not been publically disclosing its risky trading, thereby
misleading stockholders and regulators. Banks such as JP Morgan had been urging
regulators to weaken the Volcker Rule in the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010 to allow
banks to continue to engage in some risky proprietary trades.
The full essay is at "JPMorgan: An Unethical Monstrosity?"
Monday, February 25, 2013
Ukraine: Between Two Empires
With its Association Agreement with the E.U. effectively
suspended due to concerns about the “stark deterioration of democracy and the
rule of law” after the imprisonments of Yulia Tymoshenko in 2011 and Yurly
Lutsenko in 2012, Ukraine was vacillating between creating a free-trade zone
with the E.U. or a customs union with Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan. Given the
European Neighborhood Policy of the E.U. applicable to independent states
bordering the E.U., a free-trade zone with the E.U. could be the first step on
the road to further economic and even political integration, including perhaps
statehood. However, that would mean further democratic reforms that would
certainly not be required to join a customs union that includes Belarus. As a
precondition to an informed decision, distinguishing between statehood in the
E.U. and joining a customs union is vital to the Ukraine. Ideologically-driven
jargon can create confusion regarding the qualitative difference.
The full essay is in Essays on the E.U. Political Economy, available at Amazon.
Thursday, February 21, 2013
E.U. Passes Financial Transactions Tax (FTT)
Out of a “desire to ensure that the financial sector fairly
and substantially contributes to the costs of the crisis and that [the sector]
is taxed in a fair way [relative to] other sectors for the future, to disincentivise
excessively risky activities by financial institutions, [and] to complement
regulatory measures aimed at avoiding future crises and to generate additional
revenue for general budgets or specific policy purposes,” the Council of the
European Union took a decision on 14 January 2013 to allow 11 states, including
Belgium, France, Germany, and Italy, to act in a coordinated fashion with the
Commission and each other in establishing and administrating a tax on financial
transactions. That is to say, the tax is to be jointly administered by the
Commission and the states, and both levels would share in the proceeds. A few
states, most notably Britain and the Czech Republic, abstained in the voting.
The full essay is at Essays on the E.U. Political Economy, available at Amazon.
Wednesday, February 20, 2013
Challenges for E.U. Foreign Policy
Foreign policy is typically one of the domains of power that
goes to the federal level in a Union of states. The history of the E.U. in its
development provides a counter-example, as traditionally lower-level functions,
such as government regulation of business, were the first to be federalized.
Even as a counter-example, the E.U. is nonetheless a federal system, as such a
system is not defined by which competencies
are federalized. Even so, there are downsides to leaving foreign policy at the
state level. In the case of the U.S. under the Articles of Confederation
(1781-1789), the foreign policies at the state level involved the risk that
European states would try to break apart the new American union by giving the
American republics different geo-political foreign interests.
Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Wrestling Out, Dancing In: The Modern Olympics
Even as custom or tradition that has outlived its
justification—which is not the same as usefulness—is
essentially deadwood, there is presumptuousness in redefining a concept or
event without regard to how it is understood. For example, Stephanie Meyers
disregarded one of the major confining attributes of the vampire lore in enabling the vampires of the Twilight saga to not only stand in the
sunlight, but actually sparkle! It was
as though Meyers felt she need not be constrained to fit into the folklore; she
could essentially redefine it. Were a reader to object, “that’s not a vampire then!” she would presumptuously state matter-of-factly, “yes it is.” This is
essentially subjectivity presuming to define social reality as a projection of
whatever the self wills. Any constraint on the self is presumptuously thrown
off as though with impunity. Modernity
itself may have this attitude in paying too little heed to established
definitions and practices in seeking to redefine them (mindlessly retaining
customs being the other side of the coin). The Olympics may be a case in point.
In February 2013, the International Olympic Committee
decided to remove wrestling form the 2020 Olympics. That the sport was among those
of the ancient Olympic games in Greece was apparently an easily-dismissible
factor. Although the committee did not disclose its reasons, the desire to draw
younger viewers, who follow potential alternatives such as climbing and
wakeboarding, was likely among the committee members’ reasons.
Wrestling was a sport in ancient Greece, as depicted here on this ancient vase. BBC
Although including new sports to make the Olympics relevant
to a contemporary audience is advisable, and keeping the games from growing
without limit is doubtlessly prudent, taking from one of the most Olympic sports
risks removing the distinctiveness of the games, as rooted in the sports of the
ancient games. “I think this is a really stupid decision,” an Olympic historian
said. “It was in the ancient Olympics. It has been in the modern Olympics since
1896.” The decision looks even more stupid relative to the committee’s action
to retain “rhythmic gymnastics,” which is basically dancing to music. In one
manifestation, the “gymnastic athletes” conduct artistic movements with
ribbons. Watching the performance, a
viewer is apt to wonder how dance had become a sport—not to mention an Olympic sport. Meanwhile, the ancient Olympic sport of wrestling is
expendable.
Two underlying problems, or mentalities, are evinced in this
case study. First, if rhythmic gymnastics is a sport simply because it is
scored and has an international federation, then virtually anything under the
sun could be classified as a sport.
The very term sport could become a
near-tautology. One person could mean one thing by the term while another
person means something else. The term
itself could become mere reflections of personal ideological agendas.
Secondly, dismissing something elemental to a concept while
continuing to admit and tolerate applications
exogenous to the unmolested concept essentially “morphs” the concept into
another without being intellectually honest in renaming the concept. If dance
rather than wrestling is the way the Olympics are to go, then at least shouldn’t
the games be renamed so people do not expect them to be the modern expression
of the ancient games. In other words, in expressing the basis of the games
still in ancient Greece, such as by starting the torch at the original site,
and yet shifting the games away from the ancient games and toward activities
that may not even be sports, the International Olympic Committee was at the
very least sending mixed signals—or worse, trying to have it both ways. The
result could be that the concept, Olympics,
becomes severely blurred in meaning. The culprit is the presumptuous ego bristling at any possible constraint.
Sources:
Mandi Bierly, “Olympics:
What’s Your WTF Sport? And Don’t Say Rhythmic Gymnastics!” EW.com, August
9, 2012.
Monday, February 11, 2013
U.S. Postal Service: Home Delivery Up Next?
After years of billion-dollar losses, the U.S. Postal
Service announced in February 2013 that the “long-held tradition of Saturday
delivery” would come to an end. Only packages would still be delivered on
Saturdays. The Postal Service expected the change to save $2 billion a year.
That even such a minor “tradition” would have had such staying power amid
billions of dollars of losses supports the old adage, old habits die hard. It is as if even a minor change from a
long-standing practice would throw us into chaos. Our tolerance for ending
things that have been around seemingly forever is far too limited.
Moreover, the human aversion to changing long-standing
customs or practices adversely narrows perception itself. For example, the much
costlier, labor-intensive practice of delivering mail to homes was as though
above critique. Particularly with many Americans paying their bills online, the
“need” for mail delivery even five days a week to one’s house can alternatively
be viewed as antiquated. It is as if
that practice had gone on as though without any thought on it itself.
Is this highly labor-intensive custom really necessary? source: zimbio
The
door-to-door salesmen selling vacuums or Bibles had surely become a relic long
after the film Paper Moon popularized
the lifestyle. Why then have we held on to the notion that mail should be
delivered to one’s apartment building or house? We go to stores to get food and medicine. Particularly with so many people paying bills online, is mail so much more vital than food or medicine that we couldn’t just as well stop by our
local post office to pick up our mail a few times a week? At the very least, we would not be bothered by the anxiety of whether a threatening notice is waiting for us at home. Just as computer technology has enabled the
automation of stored-book retrieval in a few academic libraries (e.g., the
University of Chicago), the Postal Service could automate mail retrieval so millions
of P.O. Boxes would not be necessary.
In short, we humans are not very good at “thinking outside
the box” of current custom. Put another way, habits that have gone on seemingly
forever have a habit of going on mindlessly. The U.S. Postal Service has
suffered greatly from this particular human proclivity. Perhaps with a wider
perspective other institutions can be found that are similarly suffering
assumed demands to perpetuate practices that are no longer justified.
Source:
“U.S.
Postal Service Right to End Era of Saturday Delivery: Poll,” The Huffington Post, February 9, 2013.
Sunday, February 10, 2013
E.U. Budget Cuts: David Cameron’s Strategy
The budget deal reached by the state governments represented
in the European Council in Feburary 2013 would mark the first decrease in the
E.U.’s seven-year budget , pending approval by the European Parliament. According
to The Telegraph, “the deal sets members’ total payments to the EU for
2014-20 at €908.4 billion (£770 billion). Payments were £800 billion for the
previous seven-year round.” This was precisely what the conservative British
prime minister at the time, David Cameron, wanted. “I think the British people can be proud,” he
said after the deal had been reached. “Every previous year these deals have
been agreed, spending has gone up,” he added. “Not this time.” Beyond the relevance of the prime minister’s
rather obvious small-government fiscal-conservative ideology, his “victory” in
the European Council is in line with his strategy to keep his state in the
Union.
The full essay is at Essays on the E.U. Political Economy, available at Amazon.
Saturday, February 9, 2013
ECB’s Draghi Resists Pressure to Devalue Euro and Stimulate Growth
Despite pressures from the appreciation of the euro, which
had hit a 15-month peak of $1.3711 on February 1, 2013, Mario Draghi of the
European Central Bank announced four days later that the benchmark financing
rate would be on hold at the record-low 0.75 percent. In making the
announcement, he stressed that the worst was over for the Eurozone and that the
uncertainties would be gone by midyear. “The economic weakness in the euro area
is expected to prevail in the early part of this year. But later in 2013,
economic activity should gradually recover, supported by our accommodative
monetary policy stance and the improvement in financial market confidence.”
Draghi was tacitly undercutting Francois Hollande’s earlier statement that the
euro should depreciate so as not to hurt economic competitiveness. A higher
euro means more expensive euro-based exports abroad. The relationships between
monetary policy, a currency, and economic growth are complex. It would thus be
worthwhile to unpack the scenario facing Draghi and Hollande in early 2013.
The full essay is at Essays on the E.U. PoliticalEconomy, available at Amazon.
Thursday, February 7, 2013
S. & P. Sued for $5 Billion: Breaking a Conflict of Interest?
In sending a message to S & P as well as Wall Street more
generally regarding the excesses in the securitization of subprime mortgages
that contributed materially to the financial crisis of 2008, the U.S.
Government and several state governments announced in early 2013 that they
would sue S & P for $5 billion as a penalty and to cover damages to state
pension funds and federally-insured banks and credit unions. The operative assumption was that such a
monetary figure would have considerable force as a disincentive to profit by
means of fraud. Would $5 billion be
sufficient for the message to be delivered not only S. & P. but also to
Wall Street?
The full essay is at Essays on the Financial Crisis, and
Institutional Conflicts of Interest, both available at Amazon.
Wednesday, February 6, 2013
Is a Stronger Euro in Europe’s Interest? In America’s?
Speaking at the European Parliament in early February 2013,
Francois Hollande of France castigated the floating exchange rate of the euro. “The
euro should not fluctuate according to the mood of the markets. A monetary zone
must have an exchange rate policy. If not it will be subjected to an exchange
rate that does not reflect the real state of the economy.” The week before, the euro was at $1.37, a
15-month high. The euro was at its strongest rate against the Japanese yen
since April 2010. Behind the rise in the currency’s value was a surge in
investor interest in the euro from assessments that the worst of the debt
crisis had passed. Hollande’s statement can be critiqued on a number of points.
The full essay is at Essays on the E.U. Political Economy, available at Amazon.
Tuesday, February 5, 2013
Is the E.U. More Than the Sum of Its Parts?
In the wake of David Cameron’s announcement that he would
try to renegotiate Britain’s obligations in the E.U. then have an “in or out”
referendum in his state on whether it should secede from the Union, Francois
Hollande of France warned that state interests were in the process of usurping “the
European interest.” According to the French president, Cameron was heading the
E.U. down the path in which each state “looks for what is good for itself and
only itself.” As such, the Union would simply be an aggregation of state
interests. The question is perhaps the old one of whether the whole is more
than the sum of the parts. In proffering different answers, the European
federalists and anti-federalists (or Euro-skeptics) have fundamentally
different conceptions of what the E.U. is.
The complete essay is at Essays on Two Federal Empires, available at Amazon.
The complete essay is at Essays on Two Federal Empires, available at Amazon.
Monday, February 4, 2013
Fixing the Foreclosing Banks: A Hidden Conflict of Interest in Regulatory Compliance
After the financial crisis of 2008, regulators in the U.S.
ordered banks to hire consultants to implement more than 130 “enforcement
actions,” which represent 15% of the cases. In 2011 alone, regulators mandated
that eleven banks hire consultants to determine whether mortgage borrowers had
been wrongfully evicted. The consultants collected about $2 billion in fees,
which amount to more than half of what homeowners were to receive under the
$8.5 billion settlement that ended the consultants’ work. According to
regulators, the consultants’ work was plagued with inefficiencies. This is
probably the least of it, for virtually any
expectations for “an industry that is paid billions of dollars by the same
banks it is expected to police” are bound to be chimerical in nature.
The full essay is at Institutional Conflicts of Interest, available at Amazon.
The full essay is at Institutional Conflicts of Interest, available at Amazon.
Saturday, February 2, 2013
Facebook's Fatal Flaw: Mobile Ad Revenue?
As the largest of the social-media companies, Facebook has gone
into uncharted waters. Adding to Wall Street’s analytical headache, the company’s
strategy at least since its IPO has been to be oriented more to the long term
than is customary on Wall Street. Put another way, estimating Facebook’s
long-term viability has been notoriously difficult, particularly for Wall
Streeters who apply their traditional criteria nonetheless. Looking beyond Wall
Street’s lenses, there is indeed reason to regard investments in the company as
very risky.
The full essay is at Taking the Face Off Facebook, available at Amazon.
Friday, February 1, 2013
Excessive Standardization Pushed by the European Commission?
The E.U.’s internal market is not typically construed in
terms of federalism. Whereas the market connotes homogeneity or at least easy
transfers across state lines, a union of states wherein both are semi-sovereign
implies diversity within certain commonalities. The economic and political
systems are not mutually exclusive, or inert, however. Put another way, too
much economic standardization begins to run up against the heterogeneity that
is inherent in an empire-level union of republics.
The full essay is at Essays on the E.U. Political Economy, available at Amazon.
The full essay is at Essays on the E.U. Political Economy, available at Amazon.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)










