Shortly before leaving office, Mexican President Felipe
Canderón sent to the Mexican legislature a proposal to amend the state’s
constitution by renaming the country “Mexico,” from the “United Mexican States.”
His rationale was that Mexico didn’t need “a name that emulates another country
and which none of us Mexicans uses on a day-to-day basis.” Indeed, the
emulation evinces a category mistake in that it treats what was province in an
empire, that of New Spain, as an empire.
Friday, November 23, 2012
Mexico’s Name-Change: A United States No Longer?
Thursday, November 22, 2012
Moody’s: Statist France Lagging in the E.U.
Bashing the
French in a major article on their lack of business competitiveness, the Economist was the target of la colère en Paris in November 2012.
Just after the magazine’s warning that France could be the next danger-zone for
the euro due to relatively high labor costs and unemployment, Moody’s cut the
state’s rating to Aa1 from Aaa and kept a negative outlook on the rating.
Moody’s cited the state’s economic weakness and the risks to the finances of
the state government “posed by” France’s “persistent structural economic
challenges.” In this way, Moody’s analysis dovetails with that of the Economist. Both pointed to a sort of
impotence in French industrial policy. Moody’s decision excluded factors from
the broader debt crisis in the E.U., focusing instead on the French
government’s continued “reliance on borrowing to finance generous
social-welfare programs” even as businesses in the state were laying-off
employees. In other words, Francois Hollande had not gone far enough in his
policies to make a dent in the state’s deficit as well as the downward
trajectory of French competitiveness in the E.U. Meanwhile, deteriorating economic
conditions in the E.U. were effectively closing the window of opportunity on even
a one-party government being able to enact substantive reform. I contend that
the gap between what the Socialist party could
do, given its absolute majority in the legislature, and what it was actually
doing contributed to the criticism.
The full essay is in Essays on the E.U. Political Economy, available at Amazon.
Wednesday, November 21, 2012
House of Commons Undercuts Cameron on E.U. Budget
In 2012,
David Cameron of Britain “suffered his first major House of Commons defeat” in
governing “when some in his party failed
to back his position on the budget negotiations and urged him to secure deeper
cuts” in the pending 1 trillion euros E.U. budget for 2014-2020. Although Cameron had stated he would veto the
European Commission’s proposal to increase the overall E.U. budget by 5%
annually for the seven-year period, he did not support cutting the federal
budget. Because the vote in his state legislature for cuts in the federal
budget was non-binding, the governor was free to ignore it in the European
Council, where the state governments are represented. The European system of
public governance suffered from at least two major weaknesses here.
The complete essay is at Essays on Two Federal Empires, available at Amazon.
The complete essay is at Essays on Two Federal Empires, available at Amazon.
David Cameron representing his state at the E.U. (AFP/Getty)
Tuesday, November 20, 2012
States Pull Ahead of E.U. on Syria: A Compromised Foreign Policy?
In November
2012, the New York Times reported that the European Union was offering “crucial
support for the new Syrian political opposition,” which the E.U. referred to as
the “legitimate representative for the Syrian people.” The E.U. stopped short
of “conferring full diplomatic recognition” to the new group—the National
Coalition of Syrian Revolutionary and Opposition Forces—even though one of the
E.U.’s states, France, had conferred such recognition one week earlier, and
another state, Britain, would soon do likewise.
The full essay is at Essays on the E.U. Political Economy, available at Amazon.