Consolidated power seems, at least in theory, to be contrary to American political culture. The financial consolidation even after the financial bailouts of 2008, can be deemed dangerous economically and even politically, given the unlimited campaign contributions made possible by the Citizens United case in 2010. Such consolidation complements the political consolidation at the federal level in the U.S. Is the consolidation, which has occurred since 1865, and especially from FDR's New Deal onward, natural or contrived? That is to say, will the E.U., when it is over 200 years old, suffer the same plight? If so, federalism itself, which I submit must include a balance of power, given the checks and balances feature, between the federal level and that of the states, may be a temporary system inherently.
The full essay is at "Does Power Naturally Consolidate?"
For more on this topic, see: Two Federal Empires and American and European Federalism
The full essay is at "Does Power Naturally Consolidate?"
For more on this topic, see: Two Federal Empires and American and European Federalism